nature lover speedrun: disqualified for using the wrong technology

User draws an arbitrary moral line in the sand between authentic nature appreciation and generative AI usage, as if carbon footprints and ecological consciousness exist on mutually exclusive planes with chatbot outputs. The post sparked 458 shares of people either agreeing with this dubious gatekeeping or showing up to explain why someone can theoretically love forests AND use AI without their identity imploding. Classic internet move: create a false dichotomy, declare it fact, sit back while strangers argue in the comments about what it *really* means to be a nature lover in 2026.